DISCOUNTS, DEALS AND THE RETAIL ILLUSION
BIZ MASALA
| SUNDAY SPECIALS
DISCOUNTS, DEALS AND THE RETAIL ILLUSION
Are shoppers saving money—or being persuaded to spend more?
By Murthy ASR
| Biz Masala

Original editorial image: shoppers comparing
products amid a dense retail sale environment.
THE DISCOUNT IS A CLAIM. THE BILL IS THE EVIDENCE.
A red ‘70% OFF’ sign feels like
information. It can also become an anchor: shoppers judge the offer against the
displayed original price rather than against what the same product normally
sells for, what competitors charge, or whether the purchase was needed at all.
The right question is not how large the percentage looks. It is how much the
buyer pays for a product of comparable quality, including every condition and
fee.
This is not a claim that all discounts are
fake. Retailers use genuine promotions to clear inventory, attract customers,
introduce products, reward loyalty and compete. The forensic task is to
separate a real price reduction from a reference-price illusion, a conditional
offer that expands the basket, or a checkout total that is higher than the
headline suggested.
THE ₹10,000 TAG: A SIMPLE TEST
Suppose a product is displayed at ₹10,000
with a 30% discount, bringing the offer to ₹7,000. The arithmetic is correct
relative to that reference price. But if the same product has recently been
available from credible sellers for ₹8,000, the shopper’s saving against that
comparison is ₹1,000, not ₹3,000. A valid comparison needs the same model,
warranty, seller conditions, delivery, exchange assumptions and time period.

Illustrative price comparison—not evidence
about a particular retailer or product.
THE PROMOTION MAY CHANGE THE BASKET
Discounts can change not only which product
a consumer buys, but when they buy it, how much they buy, and whether they
switch brands. An Indian empirical study of sales promotions found that
promotions were associated with brand switching, stockpiling and purchase
acceleration rather than necessarily expanding the overall product category.
That distinction matters: a sale can move spending between brands or pull a
future purchase into today without creating a lasting consumer benefit.
Threshold offers are another example. ‘Save
₹500 on orders above ₹5,000’ can be attractive if the buyer already planned to
spend ₹5,000. It is less attractive if the buyer adds unneeded products to
cross the threshold. Research using Indian retail experiments has found that
conditional promotions can encourage shoppers to add items to reach a
threshold, with responses shaped by payment method, how far the basket is from
the threshold and the kind of items already in it.

A decision chain that separates the headline
claim from the final consumer outcome.

Illustrative basket arithmetic: a lower unit
price does not guarantee a lower total spend.
THE HIDDEN PRICE: FEES, TERMS AND EXCHANGE CONDITIONS
A promotion may be conditional on a bank
card, minimum cart value, exchange of an old device, a particular payment
method, a membership fee or a limited seller selection. Delivery, installation,
platform fees or optional add-ons can also affect the final cost. Some
conditions are legitimate and clearly disclosed; the consumer problem arises
when material terms are hard to find, change late in the journey, or make the
headline price misleading.
India’s Consumer Protection Authority
issued the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns in 2023,
identifying 13 specified practices. These include false urgency, basket
sneaking, bait and switch, drip pricing, disguised advertising and interface
interference. The guidelines address manipulative design practices; they do not
mean that every countdown clock, add-on or discount is automatically illegal.
The facts and implementation matter.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE REFERENCE PRICE
Consumers rarely have perfect price
information. A displayed ‘was’ price can shape expectations, and repeated
exposure to promotions can shift a shopper’s internal idea of what a product
should cost. Academic research on price promotions has documented this
reference-price effect. It helps explain why a discount can feel valuable even
when the buyer has no reliable baseline for the product.
The practical response is to create a
reference price independently. Check the exact model number; compare at least
two or three sellers; look at price history where reliable data exist;
distinguish a manufacturer’s maximum retail price from the price commonly paid;
and compare the final checkout amount rather than the banner.
SHRINKFLATION: WHEN THE PRICE STAYS PUT
The discount story also has a quieter
counterpart: the package that costs the same but contains less. Financial
Express reported in October 2026 that some consumer-goods companies were
reducing pack sizes by around 2–7% for selected products while maintaining
familiar price points, alongside selective price increases. These are reported
examples, not a claim that every brand or pack has changed. For shoppers, the
useful comparison is price per gram, litre, unit or use—not only the sticker
price.
A SHOPPER’S FORENSIC CHECKLIST
·
Record the exact model, pack
size, quantity, warranty and seller—not just the brand.
·
Compare the offer with recent
prices for the same item from credible sellers.
·
Calculate the final checkout
price after shipping, installation, fees and required memberships.
·
Check whether the bank offer is
instant, a later cashback, or limited by caps and eligibility.
·
Do not add items merely to
cross a threshold unless you genuinely need them.
·
Compare unit price when pack
sizes differ; a stable sticker price may hide less product.
·
Treat countdowns and ‘only two
left’ claims as prompts to verify, not reasons to rush.
·
Save the product page, invoice
and offer terms if a claim appears misleading.
WHAT SHOULD REGULATORS AND PLATFORMS DISCLOSE?
A meaningful discount label should let
consumers understand the reference price, the time and conditions attached to
the offer, the final payable amount, and any material exclusions. Platforms
should make sponsored placement distinguishable from organic ranking and
present the total price before the consumer commits. Regulators, meanwhile,
need evidence-based enforcement: preserve screenshots, compare identical
products over time, and distinguish deceptive representations from ordinary
dynamic pricing.
BIZ MASALA VIEW | SHOP THE PRICE, NOT THE PERCENTAGE
The retail sale is a competition for
attention as much as a competition on price. Genuine discounts can benefit
shoppers and help sellers manage inventory. But a percentage printed in red
does not prove that a bargain exists. A purchase can be cheaper per item yet
more expensive overall; a discount can be real but unnecessary; a stable price
can conceal a smaller pack.
The most useful consumer habit is to
reverse the order of the decision: first decide what is needed, then establish
a fair comparison price, then calculate the final bill, and only then judge the
offer. The best discount is not the largest number on the banner. It is the
lowest credible total cost for the product the buyer actually intended to
purchase.
REPORTING NOTE & METHODOLOGY
This is a desk-based analytical feature
using official Indian consumer-protection guidance, academic research on price
promotions, and recent reporting on festive-season pricing and pack-size
changes. All price and basket graphics in this article are illustrative
examples created for explanation; they are not observed transactions or
accusations against a specific retailer.
SOURCES & FURTHER READING
1.
1. Press Information Bureau /
CCPA, “Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023” (8
December 2023). https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1983994
2.
2. Press Information Bureau /
CCPA, “Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisements and Endorsements
for Misleading Advertisements, 2022” (10 June 2022). https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1832906&lang=2®=48
3.
3. Mittal & Sethi (2011),
“The Effectiveness of Sales Promotion Tools among Indian Consumers: An
Empirical Study,” Journal of Promotion Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2011.580693
4.
4. Consumer’s response to
conditional promotions in retailing: An empirical inquiry, Journal of Business
Research (2022/2023 publication record). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322001709
5.
5. Hawaldar et al., “Trapping
fake discounts as drivers of real revenues and their impact on consumer's
behavior in India: A case study.” https://researcher.manipal.edu/en/publications/trapping-fake-discounts-as-drivers-of-real-revenues-and-their-imp/
6.
6. Financial Express, “FMCG
firms balance inflation, festive demand with calibrated price hikes” (October
2026). https://www.financialexpress.com/business/news-fmcg-firms-balance-inflation-festive-demand-with-calibrated-price-hikes-4354350/
7.
7. Financial Express, “Festive
sales face a discount squeeze” (October 2026). https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-festive-sales-face-a-discount-squeeze-4356932/
EDITORIAL CAVEAT
The examples in the graphics are
hypothetical. Academic findings have sample and context limitations and should
not be treated as proof about every consumer or retailer. The article does not
allege that a named company has used misleading discounts; any case-specific
conclusion would require product-level price histories, offer terms and
evidence.
BIZ MASALA | THE BOTTOM LINE
—
Murthy ASR
BIZ MASALA
Business. Economics. The forces behind the numbers.
Typographic brand signature at the end; the
original Biz Masala logo asset was not available in this working session.
Comments
Post a Comment