FSSAI puts child-nutrition claims under the microscope
Regulator seeks evidence behind claims on infant formula and Complan; the notices raise the compliance stakes for food brands selling health benefits to parents.
By
Biz Masala Desk | October 22, 2026
|
Nestlé India |
Zydus Wellness |
India’s food regulator has asked Nestlé India and Zydus Wellness to
explain claims made for products aimed at infants and children, putting the
evidence behind nutrition marketing in focus.
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) sought
supporting material for claims on Nestlé’s Lactogen Pro 1 Powder and NAN
Excella Pro Stage 1. These included a claim that whey protein is “easy to
digest” and the statement that “5 HMOs helps support normal immune system.” The
regulator said the latter could imply that the product was suitable for
supporting immunity in relation to a particular physiological condition.
|
Lactogen Pro 1 |
NAN Excella Pro
Stage 1 |
Product images supplied for identification;
FSSAI notices seek substantiation and are not final findings.
Zydus Wellness was asked to justify claims on Complan, including “2X
faster growth,” “supports concentration and memory” and “pro immunity+ 34 vital
nutrients.” FSSAI also questioned the phrase “growth comes in four flavours” in
an advertisement. The notices seek explanations and scientific support for the
claims; they do not, by themselves, amount to final findings against the
companies.

Complan packaging displays claims questioned by
FSSAI; the notice is not a final finding.
The scrutiny also reaches beyond product packaging. FSSAI issued
notices to other food businesses and questioned an online promotion
recommending infant milk-substitute products. The regulator said the promotion
could breach rules governing the advertising and promotion of such products,
according to the published account.
For food companies, the episode highlights a growing compliance
challenge: a nutrition statement must work across the product pack, online
listing and advertising, and the company must be able to support it. In a
market where parents weigh claims about digestion, immunity, growth and brain
development, the wording can shape purchase decisions—and attract regulatory
attention.

The claims named in the notices; FSSAI has
sought supporting evidence.
That creates a business issue as well as a regulatory one. Brands
may need to review the evidence held for each claim and check that the same
wording appears consistently across channels. If a claim is challenged, changes
to packaging, digital listings or campaign material could follow. These are
potential commercial consequences, not actions FSSAI has announced in these
notices.
The FSSAI’s Advertising and Claims Regulations set the framework for
claims made in food advertising and labelling. Its notices have asked the
companies to explain why action should not be initiated under the Food Safety
and Standards Act and related rules. The companies have been given a stipulated
period to respond.
For now, the central question is whether the claims can be
substantiated under the applicable rules. The notices put that question on
record; the companies’ responses and any subsequent regulatory orders will
determine what follows.
Source notes for editors
The notices are show-cause notices and
requests for substantiation; they are not final findings against the companies.
·
FSSAI Advertising and Claims regulations and guidance
Biz Masala





Comments
Post a Comment