Telugu States in the EV Race : Who can turn policy into a working electric-mobility hub?
Telugu States in the EV Race
Who can turn policy into a working
electric-mobility hub?
BIZ
MASALA BUSINESS FEATURE | ANDHRA PRADESH & TELANGANA | 12
OCTOBER 2026

Editorial image,
illustrative: an electric bus, two-wheeler and factory setting evoke the
regional EV opportunity; this is not a photograph of a named facility.
The electric-vehicle contest between Andhra
Pradesh and Telangana is no longer a contest of policy announcements alone.
Telangana has a deeper automotive, engineering and testing ecosystem, an
electric-bus factory that has begun commercial operations and a large road-tax
waiver that has accelerated registrations. Andhra Pradesh is trying to convert
its 2024–29 mobility policy, industrial land, renewable-energy ambitions and
battery investments into a manufacturing base. The contest will be decided by
what gets produced, how much value stays local, and whether charging and public
transport make EVs useful beyond the largest cities.
The two states are building different
pieces of the same value chain. Telangana’s current edge is ecosystem density.
Andhra Pradesh’s opportunity is to add new manufacturing capacity and connect
it to ports, clean power and a deliberate domestic-supplier strategy. The
region could gain more by linking these strengths than by duplicating
incentives and competing for every project as a winner-takes-all trophy.
Telangana starts with a thicker industrial base
Telangana’s EV pitch is built on existing
auto and engineering operations around Hyderabad and Sangareddy, with Mahindra,
Hyundai, Bosch, ZF and Olectra among the companies present in the wider
automotive ecosystem. Its official investment portal lists a Mobility Valley
concept with shared battery, powertrain, advanced-driver-assistance and
vehicle-testing facilities, alongside the Zaheerabad manufacturing zone. Those
are ecosystem assets and plans at different stages; the full cluster should not
be treated as already completed.
One tangible addition is Olectra
Greentech’s Seetharampur plant. The company told stock exchanges that Phase I
reached commercial operation on 31 December 2025, with single-shift annual
capacity of 2,500 buses—half of the planned 5,000-bus capacity. This is an
operating facility, but installed capacity is not the same as actual production
or deliveries. Bus output, utilisation, local vendor orders and employment are
the next performance indicators to watch.

Editorial image,
illustrative: electric-bus assembly. It does not depict Olectra’s Seetharampur
plant.
Amara Raja’s Divitipally Giga Corridor
brings another important piece. The company says it already assembles battery
packs for light electric mobility there. Its May 2026 earnings call described
the first 2 GWh cell-manufacturing line as on track to start production in June
2027. A separate energy-storage integration facility is planned to start at 5
GWh by end-2026, with an eventual 10 GWh capacity. The timelines matter: the
cell factory is still a future milestone, while pack assembly is a current activity.
Battery energy storage systems serve the power grid as well as mobility, so
these numbers are not all EV-cell capacity.
Andhra Pradesh is making a value-add bet
Andhra Pradesh has reset its policy
framework with the Sustainable Electric Mobility Policy 4.0 for 2024–29. Its
targets include registering at least 2 lakh new electric two-wheelers, 10,000
three-wheelers and 20,000 battery-electric four-wheelers by 2029; full
electrification of the APSRTC fleet; chargers every 30 km on identified green
routes; and 100 e-mobility startup incubators. These are policy targets, not
results already achieved.
The policy’s notable design choice is to
link incentives for larger manufacturers to domestic value addition and
employment. For eligible projects, turnover-linked investment incentives rise
with local value addition, and employment subsidies use the jobs-to-investment
ratio. This could discourage assembly-only projects from claiming the same
long-term value as deeper manufacturing. The test will be whether the state
publishes claims paid, local procurement and verified jobs, rather than
reporting only announced investments.
The project pipeline gives the strategy
scale. In February 2026, the State Investment Promotion Board approved Waaree
Energy Storage Solutions’ proposed 16 GWh integrated lithium-ion battery
project at Rambilli in Anakapalli district, with a stated investment of ₹8,175
crore and roughly 3,000 direct jobs expected. Approval is not construction, and
construction is not production: land, financing, equipment installation,
commissioning and customer qualification remain milestones to verify.

Editorial image,
illustrative: battery-cell production. It does not depict Waaree’s proposed
Anakapalli facility.
Hero MotoCorp offers an existing industrial
anchor in Tirupati. As of July 2026, the company said it had invested about
₹1,600 crore in Andhra Pradesh and planned a further ₹3,200 crore over three to
five years, including a ₹750 crore global parts centre and expansion of the
Tirupati plant. The site makes both internal-combustion-engine vehicles and the
company’s electric vehicles. Hero said capacity could rise from about 0.6
million to 1.2–1.5 million units and the expansion could create around 4,000 employment
opportunities. That is a wider two-wheeler manufacturing and supply-chain
commitment, not an all-EV capacity promise.
The developing Orvakal EV mobility area in
Kurnool district could eventually complement these investments, but it remains
a park development proposition in APIIC’s industrial-park materials. It should
not yet be counted as an operating EV cluster.
The charger comparison narrows the gap

Editorial image,
illustrative: a public charging hub. Charging points and vehicles shown are
generic, not a documented site.

Operational charging
stations owned by oil-marketing companies, as reported by the Union government
on 1 March 2026. These are not the full charger universe.
On this comparable but limited measure, the
states are close: Andhra Pradesh had 1,082 operational public charging stations
in the oil-marketing-company network, against 1,173 in Telangana. This dataset
does not include every private operator, and the Union government says it does
not centrally maintain a complete count for smaller cities and highways. Still,
the small gap undercuts any easy assumption that Telangana’s urban market
automatically means a decisive charging lead.
Andhra Pradesh’s NREDCAP has moved into
procurement under PM E-DRIVE, publishing a 2026 tender for charge-point
operators at identified locations. Telangana’s own transport dashboard reports
a strong demand-side measure: from 16 November 2024 to 30 September 2026, it
granted 100 per cent road-tax and registration-fee exemptions to 1,99,320 EVs,
reporting ₹2,074.12 crore in foregone exemptions. The waiver is currently
scheduled through 31 December 2026 for covered categories.
That dashboard also reveals who has
benefited most by value. Private electric cars account for ₹1,755.90
crore—about 85 per cent—of the reported ₹2,074.12 crore exemption total, while
representing about 41,153 vehicles, roughly one-fifth of registrations covered.
Electric two-wheelers account for 1,40,962 vehicles but ₹212.88 crore of
exemptions. This is not evidence that the policy is ineffective: it has
supported adoption. It does raise a fiscal and distribution question for the
next phase: should the largest relief continue to flow to private car buyers,
or should more incentives target buses, commercial fleets, delivery vehicles
and public charging where each rupee can support wider mobility benefits?
A scorecard for what is real today
|
Andhra
Pradesh |
Telangana |
What
can be claimed today |
|
1,082 OMC
public chargers operational |
1,173 OMC
public chargers operational |
Close
comparison; not the full all-operator network |
|
Hero
Tirupati plant operating; expansion planned |
Olectra
Seetharampur Phase I operating, 2,500 buses/shift capacity |
Current
production exists in both, but capacity and output are different |
|
Waaree 16
GWh battery project approved; execution to be tracked |
Amara Raja
pack assembly operating; 2 GWh cell line targeted for June 2027 |
Battery
supply is a major regional opportunity, but cell manufacturing is still
scaling |
|
2024–29
policy links larger incentives to value-add and jobs |
2020–30
policy, Mobility Valley and demand-side tax waiver |
Different
models; compare realised value, not incentive headline size |
Operating facilities,
company-reported targets and state policy commitments are labelled separately
in the story.
Where the competition could go wrong

The regional
advantage may lie in joining assets across state lines rather than bidding
against one another for identical projects.
There are three risks beneath the
investment race. First, subsidy competition can reward land announcements
rather than durable production. Public dashboards should disclose incentives
sanctioned and paid, capital deployed, commercial-operation dates, local
procurement, jobs on payroll and projects that have stalled or exited.
Second, the states could build overlapping
industrial parks while leaving supplier gaps untouched. Cell manufacturing,
battery packs, power electronics, motors, thermal management, software,
recycling and testing need different technologies and partners. A plant’s
headline investment does not show how much of the battery or vehicle value
chain is made locally—or what share is imported.
Third, EV growth depends on charging
reliability and fleet economics, not charger counts alone. States should
publish charger uptime, utilisation, geographic coverage and tariffs. APSRTC’s
full-electrification target needs a funded procurement and depot-charging plan.
Telangana’s waiver should be reviewed before expiry with an explicit statement
of fiscal cost, vehicle-category reach and whether commercial and public
transport deserve a larger share.
A Telugu mobility corridor is the bigger prize
A practical regional strategy would let
Andhra Pradesh specialise in greenfield manufacturing, batteries and export
logistics where its land, energy and port access can help; Telangana can deepen
engineering, vehicle testing, software, suppliers and bus manufacturing around
Hyderabad’s talent base. Firms and workers already cross the state border. A
common supplier directory, interoperable charging payments, linked skilling
programmes, shared battery-recycling standards and joint fleet procurement
could make the combined market more attractive than either state acting alone.
The two governments should publish an
annual joint scorecard covering operational capacity, actual output, project
completion, domestic value addition, supplier contracts, direct and indirect
jobs, charger uptime, public-transport electrification and public incentive
cost. Reported investment should be separated into announced, approved, under
construction, commissioned and producing. Those distinctions would make the
competition legible to residents and investors alike.
For now, Telangana has the stronger
connected ecosystem and a large adoption push. Andhra Pradesh has an explicit
industrial policy, a battery mega-project in the approval pipeline and fresh
scale plans around an existing two-wheeler base. The race is open—but the
winner will not be the state with the largest promise. It will be the one that
turns incentives into production, makes more of the value chain local and gives
customers a dependable reason to plug in.
Reporting note
This is a document-based investigative
feature draft using state policy documents, government dashboards, company
filings and earnings-call disclosures available on 12 October 2026. Proposed
investments, policy targets and company capacity plans are not treated as
realised outcomes. Before publication as a fully reported investigation, verify
construction and commissioning at project sites; request incentive-payment and
payroll records from both state governments; and interview suppliers, workers,
charging operators, transport agencies and local communities. No original
interviews were conducted for this draft.
Sources and documents
Andhra
Pradesh Sustainable Electric Mobility Policy 4.0 (2024–29), G.O. Ms. No. 88 — Open source
Telangana
Electric Vehicle & Energy Storage Policy 2020–2030 — Open source
Telangana
Transport Department EV exemption dashboard (updated through Sep 2026) — Open source
Ministry of
Heavy Industries / PIB, operational public chargers as of 1 Mar 2026 — Open source
Olectra
Greentech, stock-exchange filing declaring COD for Seetharampur Phase I, 1 Jan
2026 — Open source
Amara Raja
Energy & Mobility, Q4 FY26 earnings-call transcript, 26 May 2026 — Open source
Waaree
battery project approval in Anakapalli, Indian Express, 19 Feb 2026 — Open source
Hero
MotoCorp Andhra Pradesh investment plan, PTI/ThePrint, 1 Jul 2026 — Open source
Invest
Telangana, auto, components and EV ecosystem overview — Open source
NREDCAP EV
public charging station tender under PM E-DRIVE — Open source
— Biz Masala Research Desk

BIZ MASALA
Comments
Post a Comment